Here
for comparison is submitted the translation of article from the russian magazine
"the Science and life" 7 2002. In given below the journal's article is described
the project so-called "the Boiler of explosive combustion". It is supposed to
blow up small thermonuclear bombs in the gigantic hermetically made container.
This device certainly will allow to receive controlled nuclear synthesis with an
absolute guarantee. But the cost of this power installation will be considerable
- it is necessary to do a big foundation ditch to build a steel tank of the huge
sizes and thickness etc. As well as at all traditional installations for the
decision of problem controlled nuclear synthesis, be whether it the TOKAMAK's,
the laser synthesis or the accelerators on counter beams etc., the specified
installation does not differ by compactness and she is not suitable to
transportation. Therefore the majority of experts consider this device as an
extreme measure for that case, if not it will be possible to solve problem of
the controlled nuclear synthesis in other ways. The article also contains the
interesting information on exhaustion of traditional kinds of energy carriers,
such the information in the text are denoted by a color marker.
However, in
my opinion the problem of controlled nuclear synthesis can be solved by much
more simple and cheap way with the help of the cavitation. Therefore I recommend
the reader to not lose in vain time and to return
to reading mine WEB
page.
Deuterium - an
isotope of hydrogen with one superfluous neutron in a nucleus - non-polluting,
cheap and accessible in unlimited quantities the fuel as it can is separated
from usual water. In one ton of water his is so many, what he can replace 250
tons of petroleum. Accordingly and attention to him increased. However as yet,
the truth, only in the scientific community. For example, scientists from the
Russian federal nuclear centre - the All-Russia scientific research institute of
technical physics (RFNC - ASRITP) of city of Snezhinsk (earlier: Chelyabinsk -
70) offer to blow up small thermonuclear bombs. They have persuasion, what thus
it is possible to rescue the world from power famine and ecological accident,
and the country - from poverty. The Russian armourers once have already rescued
the world from the third world war, having created the strategic nuclear and
thermonuclear weapon. What they can offer to XXI century?
The atomic scientists from
the Snezhinsk town are ready to design and construct the electric power
installation with the explosive deuterium power (EDP) - "the boiler of
explosive combustion" (BEC). It is such cask from
reinforced concrete, with diameter near 150 and height of 200 meters,
thickness of a wall - 35 meters. Inside she is coated with 20-centimetric
steel, and from above she will is covered a soil with thickness more than
of hundred meters. In this device, which name as the project BEC10. inside
a protective layer of liquid sodium with the help of explosions deuterium
by power up to 10 kiloton in trinitrotoluol equivalent it is possible to
receive each half an hour 37 gigawatt thermal energy that is equivalent to
25 million tons of a petroleum equivalent per one year. By the way,
explosive technologies for mankind no in wonder. We move the automobiles,
inside which every second there are tens the explosions creating pressure
much greater, than in BEC. Powerful explosions for the peace purposes too
not news. Development of the concept of the explosive deuterium power was
preceded the creation by experts RFNC - ASRITP (Russian Federal Nuclear
Centre - All-Russian the scientific-research Institute of Technical
Physics) under the direction of academicians E.I. Zababahin., E.N. Avrorin
and B.V. Litvinov of the "pure" deuterium charges. After all the
scientific and technical potential of institute was initially directed not
only for creation of the weapon. For industrial using, for example, were
invented one and a half tens types of the nuclear warheads, nine of which
were repeatedly used for acoustic measurements and suppressions of gas
fires, for burial places of the toxic products and prevention of
explosions of methane in collieries, for many other projects.
"Daylighting" and "tillages" of minerals have demanded creation of nuclear
charges the even with greater cleanliness with smaller quantity of the
radioactive splinters (and they were created), than it is required for
work BEC. The majority of co-authors of the concept of the BEC
participated in these works and certainly they remember "the details, in
which hide the devil". My interlocutor in 1983 has received the State
premium from the "diagnostics of thermonuclear burning". About ideas of
nuclear explosive power |
he has learned in the
beginning of 60th years from foreign publications, though in the USSR the
specialists say from the end 40. At that time I no very pay attention to
this idea because be strong propaganda "of the future successes" in
controlled thermonuclear synthesis (CNS), breeder power, and of the
"inexhaustible reserves of petroleum". Illusions disappeared in that order
to the beginning 70, 80, 90 th years. At last his first
publication, in which weaved from the doubts, be approved, and in 1993 she
was issued. Tells the GENNADY ALEKSEEVICH IVANOV the doctor of physical
and mathematical sciences the project manager of the creation of the
BEC-power station. | |
The russian
magazine "the Science and life" 7, 2002
|
Page 9 |
So can be the image of the
boiler of explosive combustion. The steel vessel (1) contains some tens
thousand tons of the heat-carrier - liquid sodium (2). Nuclear device (3)
assemble from separate components and omit at the chamber of the explode
reactor by means of the channel of delivery (4). After nuclear explosion
hot liquid sodium go in the heat exchanger (5) where he make water pairs
with a high pressure. Pairs rotates the turbine (6), connected to the
electric generator. For fission fragments (about one ton per year) is
equipped the burial ground (7): "not burnt down" fuel (uranium, plutonium)
and products of reaction (helium - 3, tritium) directed to processing.
for it the energy
of nuclear explosion. Can be, somebody the some-time will do it, but all
the same profitability micro-BEC, most likely is the fantasy. So practical
progress in this area meanwhile is absent, anyway he be very slow, in
order to replace of the terminating reserves of the petroleum and gas. -
Experts on CNS, certainly, with you disagree? - One of "fathers" CNS -
Andrey Dmitrievich Saharov in 1977 has published article "Nuclear power
and freedom of the West", in which he appealed to the West with
recommendation of return to practice of the thermonuclear explosions
|
"to not get in humiliating
dependence on hydrocarbonic fuel of the USSR". Such position he
proves by the slow progress at the area of CNS and at the area the power
engineering of the breeder - based on work of reactors - multiplicator on
fast neutrons. | |
Page 10 | The russian
magazine "the Science and life" 7, 2002
|
will start to live under present
standards of USA, of the petroleum will need about 10 billion tone in
year, or billion tones for XXI century. If the person will journey, fly
and plough only by these standards, then for one century will necessary
400 billion tons. But, by different estimations, in the interior of the
Earth remained from 120 up to 160 billion tons of petroleum. The any of forecasts speak, what the
quantity of the oil will enough only for the modern population with
"habits" USA. In
any case for last 10 years consumption of petroleum steadily grew on 3-5
percents annually. Where economy from high technologies? The computer
began to consume less, but the tractor pulling a plow, for a long time
works near to a limit. Now of the petroleum in the world remained from 20
up to 30 tons on each earthman together with his descendants. When the
Second world war began, her was 120 - 170 tons on the person. If the militarians will convince of
the politicians, what the "minimal military reserve" be 5 tons on the
person, then to plough the earth already there is nothing in
2015. |
him of a bomb, is doomed on
death. The steal of a ready warhead too is useless: in an hour after
assemblage and refuelling it the nuclear device loses ability to blow up.
It have simple explanation. Uranus in a device irradiate by the fast
neutrons. Thus what the neutron which has punch in a nucleus of uranium -
233, with some probability knock out from him two, forming a nucleus of
uranium - 232. Uranus - 232 has a half-life period of 70 years, therefore
radio-activity of him is high. Besides from neutron radiation of uranium
it is easy to be protected: neutrons can be vastly absorbed in water. But
in products of a chain of transformations of uranium - 232 there is a
thallium - 208, which is letting out rigid gamma rays with energy 2,7 MeV.
And if "fuel" of a nuclear device at the first o'clock does not represent
danger because in him still there is no thallium, but after one week with
him it is better to operate only with the help of robots. The active
stuffing of a device, produced for BEC, will be extremely dangerous to the
person after one month after manufacturing. Gradually speed of an
lifelength of thallium grows, and after some hours the material "unmasks"
itself, later 24 hours he creates problems with observance of norms of
radiating safety, later one week he becomes dangerous, and later the one
month - is fatal to the collector of a device and even for "the ammunition
carrier". Thus, "we not
can have envy to the terrorist" - has told Andrey Dmitrievich Saharov
still a quarter of century back concerning the installation similar with
BEC, in already mentioned article. | |
The russian
magazine "the Science and life" 7, 2002
|
Page 11 |
- You assert, that Russia
should become fatherland for BEC: fuel for him is required a little,
chemical pollution are absent, and radioactive waste products is formed
much less, than at burning coal? |
which prohibit informing
potential investors concerning date of creation BEC. This document imply,
that the state, which have of the wish to do of the appropriate nuclear
tests, should prove their peace character. V. PARAFONOVA My note:
| |
Page
12 |
The russian magazine "the Science and life" 7, 2002 |
(Translation into the English language has executed A.J. Streltsov.)