Earthquake data being hidden? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 5465221 United States 05/27/2021 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 5465221 United States 05/27/2021 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63950471 Russia 05/27/2021 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Broose Beach User ID: 75856748 United States 05/27/2021 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
You Are Not Worthy Of Me User ID: 79448264 United States 05/27/2021 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80408984 Canada 05/27/2021 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | found some interesting data combing through old EQs in the usgs database. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5465221 here it shows all EQs at only 15km depth from 1940-1980 40 year period over 2000 events over 4.5 magnitude [link to earthquake.usgs.gov (secure)] notice the pattern? along every major plate boundary these 15km eqs pop off. now look from 1980-2020 another 40 year period. [link to earthquake.usgs.gov (secure)] only 500 events at 4.5 magnitude at 15km depth but notice something else very few are showing now on the plate boundaries. the usgs used to use 33km as a default depth and later changed it to 10km. [link to www.usgs.gov (secure)] is the usgs and government hiding data showing the fault that runs the entire world is actually an active transform fault at 15km depth? why would they hide this data unless possibly is goes active after something triggers it. the chan thomas adam and eve story that the cia had classified peaked my interest on EQs so i dug into the data and its very peculiar. seems to back his hypothesis that the crust destabilizes from time to time and rotates along those plate boundaries. possibly at 15km? or 33km and thats why they went from default 33km to 10km to hide the 33km data? maybe the default 33km before it was changed to 10km was actually accurate data. the 33km depth EQ data is awfully suspect until 1978. either way i can see how 33km and 10km depths for default data might skew results but no where in my research could i find anything about a default depth ever being 15km which leads me to assume the 15km is legit depth. They are also deleting hours of data from the ISWA maps and hiding many volcanoes going off.....something very big is coming(already here)....We have a huge magnetic signature behind the earth and solar winds hitting us at 1.3 million mph!!, from the opposite side of the sun!....Read the Kolbrin bible and the destroyer |
anonymous_one User ID: 78969238 South Africa 05/27/2021 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very interesting. A common excuse for the increasing number of quakes on the planet is "its always been like this, monitoring is just better". If this was the case, we should see an increasing trend. But your data seems to show the opposite. If we assume (which is a valid assumption) that monitoring is improving and expanding over years, then either the earth has gone into a very settled period (which we know is not the case), or they are hiding it for some reason. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79792334 United States 05/28/2021 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Funney User ID: 80360757 Czechia 05/28/2021 01:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78842659 United States 05/28/2021 05:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80385315 United Kingdom 05/28/2021 06:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Crazyryan612 (OP) User ID: 5465221 United States 08/26/2021 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |